One
thing I found through today’s discussion on Zoarites and Shakers was a possible
explanation for the short life spans we’ve been seeing in the majority of
Utopian Societies. For example, the Zoarites lasted about 50 years, the Shakers
lasted a little over a century, and Oneida lasted about 30. Some interesting similarities
between all of these include that they all had reached stages of stability
before their downfall and that their downfalls occurred under leadership
different than the founding leadership. I believe that Utopian communities do
have a life span due to the realities of human nature: specifically, I take
into question the communities’ ability to stay engaged during times of
stability and times of less exciting leadership.
While
reading about and visiting the Zoar Village and the Shaker museum, I learned
that they experienced times of change, moving, and dispute with normal American
society. I also learned that they were able to settle down, and overcome
different challenges and issues. Specifically, we learned that Shakers overcame
issues with fighting, and also economic conformity. Further, our tour guide at
the Zoar village told us of their economic struggles shortly after arriving in
Ohio. I believe that these societies overcame these problems and came out
stronger on the other side. However, I also believe that their continued way of
life hard for them to handle after years of excitement. The Zoar tour guide
told us that, after the leader died, the Zoarites had trouble keeping the excitement
in their society. Shortly after, they fell apart and ended their communal society.
As we learned at the Shaker society, by the time the excitement of the founding
became distant history, and by the time they started having trouble keeping up
with the excitement of society, they too began to fall apart. I think that
these circumstances are directly related to lack of excitement in leadership
and everyday society.
As
the early action died down, and the founding excitement was slowly forgotten,
so did these communities’ beliefs in their own ideals and ways of life. As
things stopped changing, people started getting bored and leaving. Some communities
lasted longer than others, but it’s evident that the communities that lasted
longer had longer periods of excitement, and more memorable founders.
No comments:
Post a Comment