In this class, we learned about
utopias, intentional communities that were seen as utopias, and finally
dystopia. When we learned about utopia, we debated if utopias are possible and
if they can prosper in any manner.
Now, three weeks later, my opinion
on utopia has not changed. Utopia is a figment of the imagination, which people
create to show what THEY believe is the perfect society. Utopia differs for
everyone and no two people will have the same idea for their utopia. The main
concept that tends to be shared though is the idea of total equality. In Thomas
More’s “Utopia” and Plato’s early writing on utopia, they wrote of total
equality in which all people have the same rights, the same economic benefits,
and live the same lives. No matter the society, while utopias differ, they have
the tendency to be characterized by total equality.
Most utopian societies are created
because there is something the writer believes needs changed in society which is
contrasted with the idea of something not being able to be fixed in a dystopia.
In this class I learned that while dystopia and utopia are contrasting ideas of
perfection, they both have the characteristic of total equality. The big
difference is that one has total equality where people gain things, while in
dystopia, when someone has more than another person, they get there advantage taken
away as seen in “Harrison Bergeron”.
In conclusion, my idea of utopia has
not changed over the course of this intensive; I still believe that utopia is
an imaginary idea that would not be possible in the real world. Also, in this
class I have learned that although utopia has no singular definition and
dystopia contrasts this idea, there is a similar quality of total equality present
in both types of societies.
No comments:
Post a Comment